Transition to a water-cycle city: risk perceptions and receptivity of Australian urban water practitioners

Abstract

Transition to a water-cycle city, a sustainable urban water management future, requires the implementation of centralised and decentralised systems to augment potable water supply, protect waterways and enhance urban liveability. Risk is simultaneously driving and impeding this transition. However, risk perceptions of water practitioners and how they affect practitioner receptivity to future modes of urban water supply are poorly understood. This study characterises risk perceptions and attitudes of Australian urban water practitioners towards alternative water systems and uses a receptivity framework to suggest how receptive practitioners are to these systems. Differences between cities are identified, suggesting how familiarity might influence receptivity. These results can inform strategies to enhance receptivity, including improved communication within the water industry and beyond with its various stakeholders, improved cost-projection frameworks to provide a quantitative metric of the benefits of sustainable water options, and a shift from ‘learning to manage’ to ‘managing to learn’.

Note: Journal articles and conference papers (and links where available) are available under open access arrangements where possible. Otherwise please contact your institution’s library, the authors, or publishers to organise full access.