Current Water Sensitive Performance

Performance against the goals of a water sensitive city

Greater Adelaide was benchmarked using the Water Sensitive Cities Index in May 2017, at a workshop attended by industry representatives.

Greater Adelaide achieved its strongest result for the goal of Achieve equity of essential services (4.0/5.0). Areas for improvement included Ensure quality urban space (2.5/5.0), Ensure good water sensitive governance (2.8/5.0) and Improve ecological health (2.8/5.0).

Achieving city–states

Greater Adelaide’s results against the 6 city–states highlights its strong performance is in providing basic services. It has equitable water supply and sanitation services that are safe, secure and affordable (100% Water Supply City and Sewered City). Greater Adelaide also performs well in providing environmental sustainability services (96% Waterways City) and protecting the community against floods (83% Drainage City).

The most scope for improvement relates using water to increase resilience (47% Water Cycle City) and liveability (9% Water Sensitive City).

The Water Cycle City rating could be increased by further action to address diffuse stormwater pollution and increase tree canopy cover.

The Water Sensitive City rating could be improved by fulfilling the multiple objectives of ecosystem protection and restoration, security of supply, flood control, public health, amenity, liveability and economic sustainability.

Change strategy: how to become more water sensitive

Research relevant to Adelaide

 

The following reports relate to Adelaide's water sensitive performance:

Is the urban heat island exacerbated during heatwaves in southern Australian cities?

The cooling effect of irrigation on urban microclimate during heatwave conditions

SeweX modelling to support corrosion and odour management in sewers

Operationalising resilience to drought: Multi-layered safety for flooding applied to droughts

The influence of increasing tree cover on mean radiant temperature across a mixed development suburb in Adelaide, Australia

Models for water-sensitive middle suburban infill development (State of Australian Cities Conference presentation)

Optimization of pumping costs and harvested volume for a stormwater harvesting system

Comparison of pumping regimes for water distribution systems to minimize cost and greenhouse gases

Framework for the optimization of operation and design of systems with different alternative water sources

Designing urban cool pools

Configuring transformative governance to enhance resilient urban water systems

Transitioning to water sensitive cities: insights from six Australian cities

Impacts of WSUD solutions on human thermal comfort

  • Planning for water sensitive infill development: case study of Salisbury East precinct used the Infill Performance Evaluation Framework to assess how well different infill designs achieve higher quality urban densification and improve hydrological performance and thermal comfort.
  • Ideas for Tonsley were generated at an Industry Partners Workshop in 2013 to improve the water sensitivity of the Tonsley redevelopment. The ideas include reinstating an old water course through the site to create a blue/green corridor, enhancing the micro-climate of the development and using diverse water sources.
  • Enhancing the economic evaluation of WSUD describes ideas developed during a 2016 research synthesis workshop on South Australia’s draft Monetised Benefits of WSUD tool.
  • Salisbury case study final report: Water sensitive outcomes for infill development identifies and quantifies adverse effects of infill development on water, urban heat and architectural space quality. The Infill Performance Evaluation Framework is used to test how water sensitive design typologies and water servicing variables can improve the performance of the urban precinct in terms of liveability, water security, and resilience.
  • The Adelaide Airport irrigation trial used stormwater to irrigate a site within the airport to understand whether airport operations can be supported by maintaining appropriate vegetative cover and reducing surface and air temperature. Irrigation was found to reduce air temperature by more than 3oC on hot days.

 

The following resources relate to Adelaide's water sensitive performance:

Ideas for Tonsley

Enhancing the economic evaluation of WSUD

Salisbury case study final report: Water sensitive outcomes for infill development

Salisbury alternative water scheme

Glenelg to Adelaide Pipeline (GAP) case study

Waterproofing the west

Adelaide Airport irrigation trial

Randolph Avenue streetscape upgrade

Last updated: 7th Sep 2021